It has been an exciting spring. The early classics have been marked by unpredictable weather
and unpredictable racing. The
clear headline story, though, has been the ascension of Peter Sagan to the
darling of the cycling media. This
is not without good cause, as his performances in huge races have been
great. I cannot help but be a
little annoyed at just how quick we are to anoint Sagan as the greatest rider
since sliced bread. He is
impressive, young, and full of potential that he is beginning to fulfill—but if
we are being objective, he is not even the best classics rider currently in the
peloton.
This lack of perspective, has even led to what I would call
ridiculous comparisons between Peter Sagan and Eddy Merckx. Now I’m no stranger to sports media
hyperbole, but I have a hard time even putting Sagan in the same sentence as
Merckx. This is no dig against
Sagan. I just think we have lost
perspective on just how unmatched Merckx was, and probably ever will be, in his
accomplishments. So here is a
healthy dose of perspective on the company in which you are putting Sagan, when
you claim he is, “the next Merckx.”